David R. Ames

669 citations
27 papers · 534 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David R. Ames

26 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

David R. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Animal Science and Zoology 277
  • Small Animals 122
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Ecology 91
Replace Alastair M. Nicol with:
Alastair M. Nicol New Zealand
J. M. Brockway United Kingdom
Gal Wiener United Kingdom
M Cox Canada
Steven R. Payne United Kingdom
Richard W. Martucci United States
D. Botta Brazil
Steven Thomson Canada
Samoa J.R. Wallach United States
Michael Dooley United States
David R. Ames relative to Alastair M. Nicol New Zealand Alastair M. Nicol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alastair M. Nicol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David R. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Ames. The network helps show where David R. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David R. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David R. Ames Line = papers co-authored together David R. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199983
2 197754
3 198052
4 197551
5 197234
6 199534
7 198632
8 197128
9 198328
10 198026
11 201325
12 199119
13
Sound stress and meat animals.
197415
14 197212
15 19788
16 19797
17 19757
18 19703
19 19803
20 19783

About David R. Ames

David R. Ames is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Food Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (16 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (15 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (1 paper), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (277 citations), Small Animals (122 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (88 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations) and Ecology (91 citations). David R. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dennis R. Brink, Leon A Flicker, Dina LoGiudice, Donald Edward Ray, J. B. D. Robinson, George A. Milliken, Thomas Adams, David Andrew Nichols, Steve McKenzie and Charles J. Clanton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, European Neuropsychopharmacology, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, BioScience and Current Alzheimer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact