David Protheroe

20 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

David Protheroe
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Communication 206
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 75
  • Social Psychology 121
  • Biochemistry 21
  • Clinical Psychology 65
Replace Jane Johnston with:
Jane Johnston Australia
Stefan Seiler Switzerland
Juan Pablo Román-Calderón Colombia
Bruno Félix Brazil
Susan Whittaker Canada
Steven A. Lewis United States
Jeremy Albright United States
Durhane Wong‐Rieger Canada
Christine Pearson United States
Amber L. Stephenson United States
David Protheroe relative to Jane Johnston Australia Jane Johnston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jane Johnston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Protheroe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Protheroe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Protheroe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Protheroe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Protheroe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Protheroe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Protheroe. The network helps show where David Protheroe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Protheroe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Protheroe Line = papers co-authored together David Protheroe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996217
2 199977
3 198955
4 200537
5 200129
6 201618
7 200615
8 201410
9 199610
10 200310
11 20219
12 20149
13 20208
14 20014
15
Imports and politics: Trade decision-making in Canada, 1968-1979
19804
16 19993
17 19902
18 20081
19 20031
20 20111

About David Protheroe

David Protheroe is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 21 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), International Business and FDI (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper) and Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (206 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (75 citations), Social Psychology (121 citations), Biochemistry (21 citations) and Clinical Psychology (65 citations). David Protheroe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Kealey, Allan House, David Bowers, E A Benson, Andrew Carroll, Marie-Claire Biol, PH Davies, R C N Williamson, Peter Billings and J. L. Channer. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, International Journal of Colorectal Disease and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact