David Popenoe
Impact in
- Demography top 0.5%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Papers in
-
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 8
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 6
- Co-authors
- Alison McIntosh (1 shared paper)Robert Wright (1 shared paper)Frances Goldscheider (1 shared paper)Martha Zaslow (1 shared paper)Cheryl D. Hayes (1 shared paper)John L. Palmer (1 shared paper)Linda Haas (1 shared paper)Alison Woodward (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (12 papers)Society (6 papers)Population and Development Review (5 papers)Journal of Marriage and the Family (4 papers)Social Forces (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
David Popenoe
46 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Demography 576
- Gender Studies 396
- Sociology and Political Science 860
- Health 127
- Safety Research 96
Countries citing papers authored by David Popenoe
This map shows the geographic impact of David Popenoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Popenoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Popenoe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Popenoe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Popenoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Popenoe. The network helps show where David Popenoe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Popenoe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 358 | |
| 2 | Life without Father. | 1997 | 186 |
| 3 | 1991 | 137 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 135 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 134 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 84 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 65 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 48 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 39 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1977 | 34 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 9 |
About David Popenoe
David Popenoe is a scholar working on Demography, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Molecular Biology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Social Capital and Networks (1 paper), Social and Educational Sciences (1 paper), Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (1 paper) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (576 citations), Gender Studies (396 citations), Sociology and Political Science (860 citations), Health (127 citations) and Safety Research (96 citations). David Popenoe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alison McIntosh, Robert Wright, Frances Goldscheider, Martha Zaslow, Cheryl D. Hayes, John L. Palmer, Linda Haas, Alison Woodward, Ivan Light and Karen Oppenheim Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Society, Population and Development Review, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.