David Maher
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Development top 10%
Papers in
-
- History and Politics in Latin America 4
-
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 4
- Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia 3
- Political Conflict and Governance 2
- Co-authors
- Ingram Olkin (1 shared paper)Kenneth F. Schulz (1 shared paper)David L. Simel (1 shared paper)Andrew Thomson (3 shared papers)Vikash Ramiah (1 shared paper)Doug Stokes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Political Economy (1 paper)Review of International Political Economy (1 paper)Critical Studies on Terrorism (1 paper)International Studies Review (1 paper)Pacific-Basin Finance Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
David Maher
14 papers receiving 819 citations
David Maher's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 147
- Development 19
- Statistics and Probability 38
- Economics and Econometrics 111
- Medical Terminology 1
Countries citing papers authored by David Maher
This map shows the geographic impact of David Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Maher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Maher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Maher. The network helps show where David Maher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside David Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The CONSORT Statement Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 654 |
| 2 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 |
About David Maher
David Maher is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Development and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 17 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (4 papers), Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (3 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (2 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (2 papers) and International Development and Aid (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (147 citations), Development (19 citations), Statistics and Probability (38 citations), Economics and Econometrics (111 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). David Maher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ingram Olkin, Kenneth F. Schulz, David L. Simel, Andrew Thomson, Vikash Ramiah and Doug Stokes. Their work appears in journals such as New Political Economy, Review of International Political Economy, Critical Studies on Terrorism, International Studies Review and Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.