David M. Scott

28 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

David M. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Computational Mechanics 82
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 27
  • Mechanical Engineering 106
  • Biomedical Engineering 121
  • Ceramics and Composites 11
Replace Keishi Gotoh with:
Keishi Gotoh Japan
Kazumasa Kobayashi Japan
Nikolaos Asproulis United Kingdom
Haiyi Wu United States
Martin Glor Switzerland
Attia Boudjemline Saudi Arabia
Monika Bargieł Canada
Farhad A. Farhadpour United Kingdom
Nazish Hoda United States
David M. Scott relative to Keishi Gotoh Japan Keishi Gotoh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Keishi Gotoh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Scott. The network helps show where David M. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside David M. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David M. Scott Line = papers co-authored together David M. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200562
2 201054
3 199342
4 201431
5 199822
6 199421
7 199418
8 202216
9 199515
10 200314
11 20209
12 20108
13 19968
14 20028
15 19957
16 19936
17 19985
18 20014
19 20184
20 19904

About David M. Scott

David M. Scott is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fault Detection and Control Systems (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (3 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (3 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (3 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers) and Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (82 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (27 citations), Mechanical Engineering (106 citations), Biomedical Engineering (121 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (11 citations). David M. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Simon O. Lumsdon, C.N. Kenney, E. Alpay, Peter Spelt, Lennon Ó Náraigh, Prashant Valluri, Iain Bethune, H. McCann, W. R. Paterson and Andrew J. Willmott. Their work appears in journals such as Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, Chemical Engineering Science, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering and Design and Journal of Food Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact