David Luscombe
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John W. Baldwin (1 shared paper)Marilyn McCord Adams (1 shared paper)J.P. Canning (1 shared paper)Henry Chadwick (1 shared paper)Kenneth Pennington (1 shared paper)D. M. Nicol (1 shared paper)J. H. Burns (1 shared paper)I. S. Robinson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (2 papers)Irish Theological Quarterly (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)History of Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
David Luscombe
13 papers receiving 87 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Classics 60
- History 50
- Philosophy 43
- Religious studies 11
- Political Science and International Relations 24
Countries citing papers authored by David Luscombe
This map shows the geographic impact of David Luscombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Luscombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Luscombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Luscombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Luscombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Luscombe. The network helps show where David Luscombe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside David Luscombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 33 | |
| 2 | 1968 | 27 | |
| 3 | 1969 | 16 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 13 | |
| 6 | The Letter Collection of Peter Abelard and Heloise | 2013 | 8 |
| 7 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 9 | Anselm: Aosta, Bec and Canterbury | 1998 | 3 |
| 10 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 14 | Anselm: Aosta, Bec and Canterbury; papers in commemoration of the nine-hundredth anniversary of Anselm's enthronement as archbishop, 25 september 1093 | 1996 | 1 |
| 15 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 0 |
About David Luscombe
David Luscombe is a scholar working on Classics, History, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 132 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (14 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (8 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (60 citations), History (50 citations), Philosophy (43 citations), Religious studies (11 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (24 citations). David Luscombe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include John W. Baldwin, Marilyn McCord Adams, J.P. Canning, Henry Chadwick, Kenneth Pennington, D. M. Nicol, J. H. Burns, I. S. Robinson, Janet Coleman and Jean Dunbabin. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Irish Theological Quarterly, The Philosophical Review, The American Historical Review and History of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.