David Lees
Impact in
- Leadership and Management top 10%
- Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 7
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 3
-
- Ethics in medical practice 3
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 3
- Health, Medicine and Society 2
- Co-authors
- Michelle L. Cleary (16 shared papers)Nicholas Gerard Procter (2 shared papers)Jan Maree Sayers (7 shared papers)José Carlos Santos (1 shared paper)John R. Cutcliffe (1 shared paper)Luke Molloy (5 shared papers)Kim Walker (3 shared papers)Richard Lakeman (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
David Lees
26 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Leadership and Management 13
- Clinical Psychology 153
- Research and Theory 19
- General Health Professions 78
- Health 23
Countries citing papers authored by David Lees
This map shows the geographic impact of David Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Lees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lees. The network helps show where David Lees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 3 |
About David Lees
David Lees is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Health, Social Psychology and Leadership and Management, having authored 28 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (2 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (2 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Leadership and Management (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (153 citations), Research and Theory (19 citations), General Health Professions (78 citations) and Health (23 citations). David Lees has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Iran and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Michelle L. Cleary, Nicholas Gerard Procter, Jan Maree Sayers, José Carlos Santos, John R. Cutcliffe, Luke Molloy, Kim Walker, Richard Lakeman, Jonathan Mond and Srj Auckland. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Health Education Research, Nurse Researcher and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.