David Lassen

415 citations
6 papers · 274 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

David Lassen

6 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

David Lassen
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Communication 213
  • Political Science and International Relations 79
  • Linguistics and Language 12
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 32
  • General Social Sciences 8
Replace Haiko Lietz with:
Haiko Lietz Germany
Colleen J. Shogan United States
Michael Bossetta Sweden
John Kelly United States
Jörg Haßler Germany
Magdalena Saldaña Chile
Gabriela da Silva Zago Brazil
Bethany Anne Conway United States
Raymond A. Harder Belgium
Márton Bene Hungary
David Lassen relative to Haiko Lietz Germany Haiko Lietz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Haiko Lietz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Lassen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Lassen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lassen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lassen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Lassen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lassen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lassen. The network helps show where David Lassen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside David Lassen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Lassen Line = papers co-authored together David Lassen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2010173
2 201635
3 201632
4 201828
5 20184
6
Putting New Media in Old Strategies: Candidate Use of Twitter During the 2010 Midterm Elections
20112

About David Lassen

David Lassen is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 6 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Media Influence and Politics (1 paper), Humor Studies and Applications (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper) and Media Influence and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (213 citations), Political Science and International Relations (79 citations), Linguistics and Language (12 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (32 citations) and General Social Sciences (8 citations). David Lassen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Adam R. Brown, Dhavan V. Shah, Leticia Bode, Travis N. Ridout, Erika Franklin Fowler, Young Mie Kim, Michael M. Franz, Dietram A. Scheufele, Erik P. Bucy and Jon Pevehouse. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Computer Review, American Behavioral Scientist, Science Communication, Online Information Review and Justice System Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact