David James Wright

1.8k citations
48 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

David James Wright

47 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David James Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Rehabilitation 195
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 468
  • Neurology 170
  • Social Psychology 462
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 308
Replace Daniel Lloyd Eaves with:
Daniel Lloyd Eaves United Kingdom
Britta Lorey Germany
Arnaud Saimpont France
Ambra Bisio Italy
Nobuaki Mizuguchi Japan
Cornelia Frank Germany
Jeremy C. Rietschel United States
Sidney Grosprêtre France
Sebastian Pilgramm Germany
Matthias Bischoff Germany
David James Wright relative to Daniel Lloyd Eaves United Kingdom Daniel Lloyd Eaves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Daniel Lloyd Eaves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David James Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David James Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David James Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David James Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David James Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David James Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David James Wright. The network helps show where David James Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David James Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David James Wright Line = papers co-authored together David James Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016225
2 2014119
3 202071
4 201868
5 201164
6 201860
7 202044
8 201343
9 202142
10 201940
11 202139
12 201637
13 202236
14 201434
15 201832
16 202330
17 202229
18 201928
19 201727
20 201226

About David James Wright

David James Wright is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Neurology, Rehabilitation and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Action Observation and Synchronization (23 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (15 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (5 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (195 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (468 citations), Neurology (170 citations), Social Psychology (462 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (308 citations). David James Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Holmes, Daniel Lloyd Eaves, Greg Wood, Jacqueline Williams, Dave Smith, Zoë C. Franklin, Adam Mark Bruton, Cornelia Frank, Caroline J. Wakefield and Matthew William Scott. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Journal of Motor Behavior, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact