David Howell

34 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

David Howell
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Conservation 19
  • Ceramics and Composites 16
  • Geophysics 36
  • Inorganic Chemistry 37
  • Archeology 26
Replace J. E. Chisholm with:
J. E. Chisholm United Kingdom
Mary E. Mrose United States
Nobuyuki Aikawa Japan
G. Diamantopoulos Greece
A. Livingstone United Kingdom
Vladimir Khomenko Germany
Lubomı́r Prokeš Czechia
Stefan Graeser Switzerland
R. S. W. Braithwaite United Kingdom
John McAndrew United States
David Howell relative to J. E. Chisholm United Kingdom J. E. Chisholm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
J. E. Chisholm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Howell. The network helps show where David Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Howell Line = papers co-authored together David Howell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200236
2 198728
3 199027
4
Investigation of cation order in MgSiO3-rich garnet using 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR spectroscopy
199225
5 200325
6 199922
7 197417
8
MAS NMR spectroscopic study of Mg29SiO3 with the perovskite structure
199110
9 199810
10 201210
11 19996
12 20105
13 20095
14 19885
15 20094
16 20074
17 19994
18 20094
19
School management and government
19684
20 19754

About David Howell

David Howell is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Archeology and Education, having authored 36 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drilling and Well Engineering (8 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (7 papers), Oil and Gas Production Techniques (6 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (4 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers) and Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (19 citations), Ceramics and Composites (16 citations), Geophysics (36 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (37 citations) and Archeology (26 citations). David Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gerald K. Johnson, Ian R. Tasker, C. Carr, R. James Kirkpatrick, Brian L. Phillips, J.V. Smith, Peter Gosden, Tibor Gasparik, P.A.G. O’Hare and Timothy Bates. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Science, American Mineralogist, Review of Radical Political Economics, Journal of Microscopy and Journal of Educational Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact