David Hooson

524 citations
37 papers · 375 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David Hooson

31 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

David Hooson
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Geography, Planning and Development 110
  • Anthropology 65
  • Demography 41
  • Sociology and Political Science 133
  • Political Science and International Relations 69
Replace John Leighly with:
John Leighly United States
H. C. Darby United Kingdom
Carville Earle United States
Mildred Berman United States
Edmund W. Gilbert Tunisia
W. Gordon East United Kingdom
E. M. J. Campbell
George Kish United States
Wallace Stegner United States
Norton Ginsburg United States
David Hooson relative to John Leighly United States John Leighly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
John Leighly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Hooson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hooson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hooson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hooson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hooson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hooson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hooson. The network helps show where David Hooson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside David Hooson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Hooson Line = papers co-authored together David Hooson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200179
2 196152
3 198435
4 196223
5
The Soviet Union : people and regions
196621
6 197820
7 197118
8 196817
9 197114
10 197113
11 199813
12 196011
13 19599
14 19628
15 19846
16 19725
17 20044
18 19604
19 19643
20 19872

About David Hooson

David Hooson is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Demography, having authored 37 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (9 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (5 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (5 papers), Soviet and Russian History (2 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers), Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (2 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (2 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (110 citations), Anthropology (65 citations), Demography (41 citations), Sociology and Political Science (133 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (69 citations). David Hooson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Susan Schulten, William H. Parker, Glenn T. Trewartha, Ralph S. Clem, Martin W. Lewis, Kären Wigen, George B. Cressey, Roland J. Fuchs and George J. Demko. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Review, Pacific Affairs, Geographical Journal, GeoJournal and The Professional Geographer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact