David Hempton
Impact in
- Religious studies top 5%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Papers in
- History 11
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 5
- Catholicism and Religious Studies 2
- Historical Studies of British Isles 2
-
- Irish and British Studies 5
- Religion and Society Interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Richard T. Rogers (1 shared paper)David Bebbington (1 shared paper)Donald M. Lewis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)The Journal of Ecclesiastical History (1 paper)History of Education (1 paper)Irish Historical Studies (1 paper)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Hempton
14 papers receiving 83 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Religious studies 21
- History 43
- Political Science and International Relations 39
- Geography, Planning and Development 9
- Literature and Literary Theory 17
Countries citing papers authored by David Hempton
This map shows the geographic impact of David Hempton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hempton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hempton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Hempton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hempton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hempton. The network helps show where David Hempton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside David Hempton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 26 | |
| 2 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 4 | Religion of the People: Methodism and Popular Religion 1750-1900 | 1996 | 17 |
| 5 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About David Hempton
David Hempton is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies and Classics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 116 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), Irish and British Studies (5 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (21 citations), History (43 citations), Political Science and International Relations (39 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (9 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (17 citations). David Hempton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard T. Rogers, David Bebbington and Donald M. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, History of Education, Irish Historical Studies and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.