David H. Van Lear

3.9k citations
69 papers · 3.0k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

David H. Van Lear

66 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

David H. Van Lear
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.9k
  • Ecology 1.3k
  • Soil Science 469
  • Ecological Modeling 146
Replace Karel Klinka with:
Karel Klinka Canada
Barton D. Clinton United States
Dennis H. Knight United States
Creighton M. Litton United States
Glenn D. Mroz United States
Fred L. Bunnell Canada
Constance A. Harrington United States
Dominik Hessenmöller Germany
P. L. Marks United States
Glenn Motzkin United States
David H. Van Lear relative to Karel Klinka Canada Karel Klinka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Karel Klinka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David H. Van Lear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Van Lear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Van Lear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Van Lear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Van Lear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Van Lear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Van Lear. The network helps show where David H. Van Lear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David H. Van Lear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David H. Van Lear Line = papers co-authored together David H. Van Lear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005334
2 1995259
3 1998198
4
Prescribed fire effects on herpetofauna: Review and management implications
1999177
5 1988176
6 2002128
7 1998126
8 199299
9 199896
10 199992
11 199687
12 199866
13 199865
14 199564
15 198459
16 200059
17 199652
18 198545
19 198444
20 200242

About David H. Van Lear

David H. Van Lear is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 69 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (25 papers), Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (13 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.9k citations), Ecology (1.3k citations), Soil Science (469 citations) and Ecological Modeling (146 citations). David H. Van Lear has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malawi and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P.R. Kapeluck, Patrick H. Brose, J. Larry Landers, William D. Boyer, Rhett Johnson, Wayne T. Swank, David C. Guynn, Kevin R. Russell, Craig W. Hedman and Patrick D. Keyser. Their work appears in journals such as Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Forest Ecology and Management, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Journal of Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact