David E. Mino
Impact in
- Surgery top 5%
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 3
- Surgery 6
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 3
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 1
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 1
- Co-authors
- Andrew K. Palmer (3 shared papers)E. Mark Levinsohn (2 shared papers)Bruce E. Fredrickson (1 shared paper)Hansen A. Yuan (1 shared paper)David G. Murray (2 shared papers)Holly Russell (1 shared paper)Michael Manocchia (1 shared paper)Dennis V. Ary (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2 papers)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (1 paper)Orthopedic Clinics of North America (1 paper)Pain Management Nursing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David E. Mino
10 papers receiving 697 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Surgery 543
- Pharmacology 84
- General Health Professions 70
- Applied Psychology 13
- Rehabilitation 14
Countries citing papers authored by David E. Mino
This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Mino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Mino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Mino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Mino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Mino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Mino. The network helps show where David E. Mino may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside David E. Mino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 180 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 159 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 119 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 117 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 78 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 65 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 3 |
About David E. Mino
David E. Mino is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 10 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper), Bone fractures and treatments (1 paper), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (1 paper), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper) and Bone Metabolism and Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (543 citations), Pharmacology (84 citations), General Health Professions (70 citations), Applied Psychology (13 citations) and Rehabilitation (14 citations). David E. Mino has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew K. Palmer, E. Mark Levinsohn, Bruce E. Fredrickson, Hansen A. Yuan, David G. Murray, Holly Russell, Michael Manocchia, Dennis V. Ary, A. Blair Irvine and Rebecca L. Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Orthopedic Clinics of North America and Pain Management Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.