David Doley

2.1k citations
111 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

David Doley

104 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David Doley
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 520
  • Global and Planetary Change 772
  • Forestry 92
  • Soil Science 195
  • Plant Science 653
Replace M. Rasoul Sharifi with:
M. Rasoul Sharifi United States
N. Phillips United States
Alejandro Valdecantos Spain
Linda Meiresonne Belgium
Astrid Volder United States
Raimundo Cosme de Oliveira Brazil
Clément Stahl French Guiana
Guangsheng Zhou China
Alessandra Rodrigues Kozovits Brazil
Ronald E. Sosebee United States
David Doley relative to M. Rasoul Sharifi United States M. Rasoul Sharifi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Rasoul Sharifi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Doley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Doley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Doley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Doley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Doley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Doley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Doley. The network helps show where David Doley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Doley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Doley Line = papers co-authored together David Doley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Modelling plant growth and development
1986215
2 1997146
3 2013104
4 196870
5 199363
6 201263
7 196753
8 201547
9 200342
10 201540
11 201739
12 200439
13 198138
14 198732
15
Mine rehabilitation: leading practice sustainable development program for the mining industry
201631
16 197428
17 200328
18 198827
19 201627
20 197826

About David Doley

David Doley is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 111 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (25 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (19 papers), Forest ecology and management (18 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (13 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (12 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (8 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (520 citations), Global and Planetary Change (772 citations), Forestry (92 citations), Soil Science (195 citations) and Plant Science (653 citations). David Doley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David J. Yates, Patrick Audet, Glyn Rimmington, Michael R. Ngugi, L. Leyton, Lindsay B. Hutley, MA Hunt, P. J. Dart, Paul Ryan and D. R. Mulligan. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Australian Journal of Botany, Australian Forestry, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Ecological Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact