David Desser

618 citations
22 papers · 107 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

David Desser

12 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers

David Desser
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Cultural Studies 39
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
  • Literature and Literary Theory 28
  • Music 5
  • Economics and Econometrics 40
Replace Sumiko Higashi with:
Sumiko Higashi United States
Leo Charney United States
Barbara Klinger United States
Barbara Correll
P. N. Furbank United Kingdom
Joy Gould Boyum
Clive Bloom United Kingdom
Yomi Braester United States
Chris Perriam United Kingdom
Robert P. Kolker United States
David Desser relative to Sumiko Higashi United States Sumiko Higashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sumiko Higashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Desser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Desser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Desser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Desser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Desser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Desser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Desser. The network helps show where David Desser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside David Desser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Desser Line = papers co-authored together David Desser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Hollywood goes shopping
200023
2
Eros Plus Massacre: An Introduction to the Japanese New Wave Cinema
198819
3 198613
4
Cinema and Cultural Identity: Reflections on Films from Japan, India, and China
198811
5 19889
6 19957
7
American Jewish Filmmakers
20036
8 19835
9 20003
10 19852
11 20092
12 19892
13 19971
14 19881
15 19911
16 19921
17 20021
18 19980
19 19920
20 19920

About David Desser

David Desser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 22 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (6 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (2 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (39 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (28 citations), Music (5 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (40 citations). David Desser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Garth S. Jowett, Paul Varley, Wimal Dissanayake, Lester D. Friedman, Gina Marchetti and Lindsay Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Film Quarterly, Quarterly Review of Film and Video, Screen, Monumenta Nipponica and South Central Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact