David Desser

586 citations
33 papers · 199 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

David Desser

20 papers receiving 99 citations

Peers

David Desser
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Cultural Studies 83
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
  • Music 17
  • Literature and Literary Theory 42
  • Economics and Econometrics 64
Replace Christopher Frayling with:
Christopher Frayling United Kingdom
Sharon Monteith United Kingdom
Sumiko Higashi United States
Leo Charney United States
Talia Schaffer United States
Patricia Brett Erens Hong Kong
Dennis Bingham United States
Tim Bergfelder France
Martin Shingler United Kingdom
Gill Plain United Kingdom
David Desser relative to Christopher Frayling United Kingdom Christopher Frayling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Christopher Frayling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Desser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Desser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Desser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Desser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Desser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Desser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Desser. The network helps show where David Desser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Desser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Desser Line = papers co-authored together David Desser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Hollywood goes shopping
200042
2
Cinema and Cultural Identity: Reflections on Films from Japan, India, and China
198824
3 200023
4
Eros Plus Massacre: An Introduction to the Japanese New Wave Cinema
198823
5 198614
6 200013
7 201211
8 19888
9 19958
10
American Jewish Filmmakers
20037
11 19835
12 20093
13 19852
14 20112
15 19892
16 20082
17 20052
18 20142
19 20171
20 20021

About David Desser

David Desser is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 33 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (10 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (10 papers), Japanese History and Culture (10 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (7 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and South Asian Cinema and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (83 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations), Music (17 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (64 citations). David Desser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Garth S. Jowett, Wimal Dissanayake, Paul Varley, Lester D. Friedman, Joanna E. Rapf, Gina Marchetti and Lindsay D. Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Film Quarterly, Quarterly Review of Film and Video, Screen, Monumenta Nipponica and South Central Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact