David Depew

48 papers receiving 763 citations

Peers

David Depew
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • History and Philosophy of Science 210
  • General Psychology 13
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 162
  • Philosophy 91
  • Cultural Studies 60
Replace Claus Emmeche with:
Claus Emmeche Denmark
William C. Wimsatt United States
Sandra D. Mitchell United States
Jesper Hoffmeyer Denmark
Frederik Stjernfelt Denmark
John Beatty United States
Charbel Niño El-Hani Brazil
Dorion Sagan United States
Jakob von Uexküll
Jacob Bronowski United States
David Depew relative to Claus Emmeche Denmark Claus Emmeche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Claus Emmeche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Depew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Depew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Depew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Depew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Depew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Depew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Depew. The network helps show where David Depew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside David Depew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Depew Line = papers co-authored together David Depew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered
2003165
2
Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science
1985128
3
Entropy, Information and Evolution: New Perspectives on Physical and Biological Evolution
1988105
4 198978
5 199655
6 200453
7 199441
8 201730
9 200429
10 199525
11 200118
12 201118
13 201116
14 200516
15 200811
16
Politics, Music, and Contemplation in Aristotle's Best State
199111
17 201310
18 19898
19
The Baldwin Effect: an archaeology.
20007
20 19985

About David Depew

David Depew is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Genetics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Evolution and Science Education (14 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (4 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (210 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (162 citations), Philosophy (91 citations) and Cultural Studies (60 citations). David Depew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard H. F. Weber, Marjorie Grene, James D. Smith, Chris Van Dyke, John P. Jackson, Jeffrey S. Wicken, Robert E. Ulanowicz, Stanley N. Salthe, Eric Schneider and Ronald L. Numbers. Their work appears in journals such as Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Journal of American History, Philosophy and Rhetoric, Biology & Philosophy and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact