David Dearman

1.1k citations
30 papers · 913 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

David Dearman

30 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

David Dearman
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Human-Computer Interaction 501
  • Information Systems and Management 165
  • Computer Science Applications 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 219
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 234
Replace Martin Halvey with:
Martin Halvey United Kingdom
Marek Bell United Kingdom
Scott Lederer United States
Malcolm Hall United Kingdom
Karen Mecoles Australia
Paul Holleis Germany
Ian E. Smith United States
Beat Signer Belgium
Nitin Sawhney United States
Nikola Banović United States
David Dearman relative to Martin Halvey United Kingdom Martin Halvey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Martin Halvey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Dearman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Dearman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Dearman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Dearman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Dearman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Dearman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Dearman. The network helps show where David Dearman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside David Dearman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Dearman Line = papers co-authored together David Dearman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008160
2 200998
3 201073
4 200855
5 200545
6 201245
7 201041
8 201034
9 200728
10 200928
11 200525
12 201125
13 200523
14 200723
15 201022
16 201220
17 201218
18 201017
19 200617
20
Multi-modal text entry and selection on a mobile device
201016

About David Dearman

David Dearman is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications and Information Systems, having authored 30 papers that have together received 913 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (10 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (8 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (6 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (6 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (6 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (501 citations), Information Systems and Management (165 citations), Computer Science Applications (99 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (219 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (234 citations). David Dearman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Khai N. Truong, Kori Inkpen, Koji Yatani, Melanie Kellar, Jeremy A. Scott, Alex Varshavsky, Eyal de Lara, Kirstie Hawkey, Timothy Sohn and Derek Reilly. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Pervasive Computing, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Interacting with Computers and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact