David Cox

1.9k citations
34 papers · 1.2k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

David Cox

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 312
  • Infectious Diseases 428
  • Microbiology 123
  • Epidemiology 318
  • Virology 38
Replace Amalia S. Meier with:
Amalia S. Meier United States
J R Harris United Kingdom
Bernice Moll United States
Maria Fernanda Rios Grassi Brazil
Robert Teclaw United States
Robert J. MacKay United States
Josephine G. Walker United Kingdom
Seth L. Welles United States
Alessandra Falchi France
Natalie Pica United States
David Cox relative to Amalia S. Meier United States Amalia S. Meier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Amalia S. Meier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Cox. The network helps show where David Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Cox Line = papers co-authored together David Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005307
2 1987272
3 200795
4 200576
5 200959
6
Pathogenesis and diagnosis of infections with Mycobacterium bovis in cattle. Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB.
200052
7 200746
8 199644
9 199029
10 201128
11 198320
12 199715
13 201215
14 200814
15 198114
16
Bovine tuberculosis: towards a future control strategy.
200011
17 19979
18 20207
19 20066
20 19976

About David Cox

David Cox is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (9 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (8 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (2 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (312 citations), Infectious Diseases (428 citations), Microbiology (123 citations), Epidemiology (318 citations) and Virology (38 citations). David Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christl A. Donnelly, Roșie Woodroffe, John McInerney, G. Gettinby, W. Ivan Morrison, F.J. Bourne, W. Thomas Johnston, Helen E. Jenkins, C. L. Cheeseman and Andrea M. Le Fevre. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, PLoS ONE, Statistics in Medicine and Diabetes Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact