David Corfield

30 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

David Corfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Theoretical Computer Science 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 136
  • Mathematical Physics 44
  • Philosophy 44
  • Statistics and Probability 29
Replace Carlo Cellucci with:
Carlo Cellucci Italy
Emily Grosholz United States
David Sherry United States
Marco Panza France
John L. Bell Canada
José Ferreirós Spain
Thomas Tymoczko United States
Yehuda Rav France
Michael Stöltzner United States
D. van Dalen Netherlands
David Corfield relative to Carlo Cellucci Italy Carlo Cellucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carlo Cellucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Corfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Corfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Corfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Corfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Corfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Corfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Corfield. The network helps show where David Corfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside David Corfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Corfield Line = papers co-authored together David Corfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200194
2 200375
3 199731
4 200930
5 199811
6 20209
7 20159
8 20108
9 20027
10 20236
11 20106
12 20126
13 20046
14 20016
15
Popper, Falsification and the VC-dimension
20056
16
Why Do People Get Ill
20076
17 20144
18 20014
19 20123
20 20103

About David Corfield

David Corfield is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (93 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (136 citations), Mathematical Physics (44 citations), Philosophy (44 citations) and Statistics and Probability (29 citations). David Corfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. B. P. Williamson, Bernhard Schölkopf, Vladimir Vapnik, Urs Schreiber, Hisham Sati and Jon Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Mathematica, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Synthese, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics and Metascience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact