David Carleton

478 citations
6 papers · 335 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • International Development and Aid
    • Political Conflict and Governance
    • Human Rights and Development
    • Religion, Society, and Development
    • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Papers in

David Carleton

6 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

David Carleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Development 141
  • Sociology and Political Science 280
  • Political Science and International Relations 129
  • History 48
  • Law 21
Replace Feryal M. Cherif with:
Feryal M. Cherif United States
Brigitte Weiffen Germany
Amichai Magen United States
Julia Bader Netherlands
Conway W. Henderson United States
William B. Moul Canada
Juan Gabriel Tokatlián Argentina
James Dobbins United States
Letícia Pinheiro Brazil
Larbi Sadiki Qatar
David Carleton relative to Feryal M. Cherif United States Feryal M. Cherif's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Feryal M. Cherif · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Carleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Carleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Carleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Carleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Carleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Carleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Carleton. The network helps show where David Carleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside David Carleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Carleton Line = papers co-authored together David Carleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About David Carleton

David Carleton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Development and History, having authored 6 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (1 paper), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper), Economic Growth and Development (1 paper), Military History and Strategy (1 paper), Political Conflict and Governance (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and International Development and Aid (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (141 citations), Sociology and Political Science (280 citations), Political Science and International Relations (129 citations), History (48 citations) and Law (21 citations). David Carleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Stohl, Steven Johnson, George Α. Lopez and Gordon T. Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Human Rights Quarterly, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Peace Research, SAIS Review and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact