David C. Post

450 citations
22 papers · 394 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David C. Post

22 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

David C. Post
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Insect Science 231
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 346
  • Genetics 366
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 20
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 10
Replace W. F. Buren with:
W. F. Buren United States
R. York Edwards United States
A. Pouvreau France
Keiichi Masuko Japan
Sôichi Yamane Japan
Jean-Claude Verhaeghe Belgium
Caroline Liepert Germany
R. J. Quinlan Canada
S. Dronnet France
Mary Talbot United States
David C. Post relative to W. F. Buren United States W. F. Buren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
W. F. Buren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Post

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Post

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Post. The network helps show where David C. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David C. Post, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Post Line = papers co-authored together David C. Post links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198342
2 198340
3 198239
4 198938
5 198333
6 198432
7 198430
8 198720
9 198217
10 198016
11 198213
12 198012
13 198311
14 19858
15 19858
16 19828
17
Observations on female nesting and male behavior of Stictia signata (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) in Brazil
19817
18 19827
19 19844
20
CDD and elite capture : reframing the conversation
20084

About David C. Post

David C. Post is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (20 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper), Community Development and Social Impact (1 paper), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper) and Fossil Insects in Amber (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (231 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (346 citations), Genetics (366 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (20 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (10 citations). David C. Post has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Jeanne, Holly Downing, Robert E. Page, Robert A. Metcalf, E. H. Erickson, D. L. Faustini and Wendell E. Burkholder. Their work appears in journals such as Insectes Sociaux, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Physiological Entomology and Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact