David C. Deane

806 citations
35 papers · 526 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

David C. Deane

34 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

David C. Deane
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Ecological Modeling 112
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 308
  • Global and Planetary Change 160
  • Ecology 187
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 134
Replace Nicole L. Kinlock with:
Nicole L. Kinlock United States
Simone Fontana Switzerland
Anna E‐Vojtkó Hungary
Enrico Tordoni Italy
Mike G. Le Duc United Kingdom
Julie Ripplinger United States
Riccardo Santoro Italy
Fabian Roger Sweden
Andros T. Gianuca Brazil
Chelsea Chisholm Canada
David C. Deane relative to Nicole L. Kinlock United States Nicole L. Kinlock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Nicole L. Kinlock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Deane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Deane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Deane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Deane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Deane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Deane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Deane. The network helps show where David C. Deane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David C. Deane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Deane Line = papers co-authored together David C. Deane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201854
2 201949
3 202148
4 202343
5 200536
6 201728
7 202126
8 201624
9 201723
10 202023
11 201621
12 201819
13 202118
14 201616
15 201711
16 202110
17 20228
18 20217
19 20237
20 20177

About David C. Deane

David C. Deane is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 35 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (5 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (4 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (112 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (308 citations), Global and Planetary Change (160 citations), Ecology (187 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (134 citations). David C. Deane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Fangliang He, Britta Schaffelke, Yu Liu, Chengjin Chu, Xinghua Sui, Suqin Fang, Haibin Yu, Damien A. Fordham, Corey J. A. Bradshaw and Zihui Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Oecologia, Ecology and Evolution and Biological Invasions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact