David Bock
Impact in
-
- Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
- Oncology top 5%
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Eva Angenete (59 shared papers)Christian Sonesson (2 shared papers)Eva Haglind (33 shared papers)Jacob Rosenberg (21 shared papers)Eva Haglind (18 shared papers)S. Skullman (8 shared papers)Anette Wedin (10 shared papers)Jennifer Park (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Colorectal Disease (12 papers)International Journal of Colorectal Disease (7 papers)British journal of surgery (5 papers)Annals of Surgery (5 papers)BMC Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Bock
82 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 176
- Oncology 467
- Surgery 719
- Statistics and Probability 129
- Emergency Medicine 83
Countries citing papers authored by David Bock
This map shows the geographic impact of David Bock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Bock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bock. The network helps show where David Bock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Bock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 235 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 128 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 66 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 63 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 47 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 47 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 44 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 30 |
About David Bock
David Bock is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (9 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (8 papers), Stoma care and complications (7 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (4 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (4 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (176 citations), Oncology (467 citations), Surgery (719 citations), Statistics and Probability (129 citations) and Emergency Medicine (83 citations). David Bock has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eva Angenete, Christian Sonesson, Eva Haglind, Jacob Rosenberg, Eva Haglind, S. Skullman, Anette Wedin, Jennifer Park, Mattias Prytz and Eva Andersson. Their work appears in journals such as Colorectal Disease, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, British journal of surgery, Annals of Surgery and BMC Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.