David Biale
Impact in
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Philosophy top 2%
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Papers in
- Demography 18
- Jewish Identity and Society 18
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 13
- Co-authors
- Mary Douglas (1 shared paper)Daniel J. Elazar (1 shared paper)David Vital (1 shared paper)Susannah Heschel (2 shared papers)Michael Galchinsky (2 shared papers)R. J. Zwi Werblowsky (1 shared paper)Robert S. Westman (2 shared papers)Samuel C. Heílman (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Jewish Social Studies (6 papers)The American Historical Review (4 papers)Rethinking History (1 paper)Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience (1 paper)History of Religions (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Biale
34 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Religious studies 80
- Philosophy 114
- Demography 93
- Sociology and Political Science 304
- Archeology 50
Countries citing papers authored by David Biale
This map shows the geographic impact of David Biale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Biale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Biale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Biale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Biale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Biale. The network helps show where David Biale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside David Biale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 50 | |
| 2 | Power & powerlessness in Jewish history | 1986 | 49 |
| 3 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 16 | Hasidism: A New History | 2017 | 8 |
| 17 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 6 |
About David Biale
David Biale is a scholar working on Demography, Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Archeology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (31 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (18 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (80 citations), Philosophy (114 citations), Demography (93 citations), Sociology and Political Science (304 citations) and Archeology (50 citations). David Biale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mary Douglas, Daniel J. Elazar, David Vital, Susannah Heschel, Michael Galchinsky, R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, Robert S. Westman, Samuel C. Heílman, David Assaf and Benjamin Harshav. Their work appears in journals such as Jewish Social Studies, The American Historical Review, Rethinking History, Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience and History of Religions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.