David Bain

478 citations
13 papers · 235 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
    • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Mental Health and Psychiatry
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Papers in

    • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 6
    • Pain Management and Placebo Effect 6
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 3
    • Mental Health and Psychiatry 2

David Bain

10 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

David Bain
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 182
  • Philosophy 82
  • Sensory Systems 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
  • Social Psychology 92
Replace Brian Cutter with:
Brian Cutter United States
Jean‐Rémy Martin France
Soren Wainio‐Theberge Canada
Christiana Westlin United States
Federico Dazzi Italy
Dorothee E. Mutschler Germany
Katherine L. Forthman United States
Marcel Riehle Germany
Jessica Zakrzewski United States
Eleonora Vagnoni United Kingdom
David Bain relative to Brian Cutter United States Brian Cutter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Brian Cutter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Bain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Bain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Bain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bain. The network helps show where David Bain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside David Bain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Bain Line = papers co-authored together David Bain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201285
2 201333
3 200331
4 201726
5 200722
6
The Imperative View of Pain
201115
7 201411
8 20177
9 20093
10 20252
11 20250
12 20070
13 20170

About David Bain

David Bain is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (1 paper) and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (182 citations), Philosophy (82 citations), Sensory Systems (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations) and Social Psychology (92 citations). David Bain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Brady, Jun Sun, Jingyi Wang, Ralf Sasse and Dennis Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Topics, Journal of Consciousness Studies and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact