David A. Smith

150 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

David A. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Management Information Systems 382
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 847
  • Applied Mathematics 345
  • Modeling and Simulation 114
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 273
Replace Ronald Friedman with:
Ronald Friedman United States
Stephen M. Stigler United States
René Thom France
Xiaoqian Wang China
H. L. Le Roy Switzerland
Louis Guttman Israel
Martin R. Gardner United States
Robert Hilborn United States
Paul A. L. de Boeck Belgium
Herman Rubin United States
David A. Smith relative to Ronald Friedman United States Ronald Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×
Ronald Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David A. Smith. The network helps show where David A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David A. Smith Line = papers co-authored together David A. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 172 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003334
2 1994243
3 1991182
4 1979176
5 1994174
6 2010174
7 1987166
8 1990123
9 1993118
10 1982113
11 1991112
12 2019112
13 1986105
14 201075
15 199171
16 201668
17 199364
18 199663
19 198861
20 198955

About David A. Smith

David A. Smith is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Algebra and Number Theory, Education and Demography, having authored 172 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (35 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (13 papers), Mathematical and Computational Methods (12 papers), Optical Network Technologies (7 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (6 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (6 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (4 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (382 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (847 citations), Applied Mathematics (345 citations), Modeling and Simulation (114 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (273 citations). David A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William F. Ford, Kim Langfield‐Smith, J.E. Baran, Avram Sidi, Robert H. Chenhall, Matthew Hall, Steven B. Schwarzkopf, Ernest N. Jouriles, John E. Richters and Everett Waters. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Electronics Letters, Optics Letters and Journal of Lightwave Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact