Darius Weber

898 citations
23 papers · 733 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Darius Weber

23 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Darius Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 219
  • Ecological Modeling 50
  • Ecology 376
  • Statistics and Probability 37
  • Insect Science 31
Replace Dean F. Stauffer with:
Dean F. Stauffer United States
Henning Heldbjerg Denmark
Darren P. Niejalke Australia
Fiona Burns United Kingdom
Daniel R. Petit United States
Douglas A. Keinath United States
Paul Hendricks United States
Leo L. Soldaat Netherlands
Kimberly Titus United States
Martha M. Ellis United States
Darius Weber relative to Dean F. Stauffer United States Dean F. Stauffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Dean F. Stauffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Darius Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Darius Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Darius Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Darius Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Darius Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Darius Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Darius Weber. The network helps show where Darius Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Darius Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Darius Weber Line = papers co-authored together Darius Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007140
2 2004122
3 2010105
4 198957
5 200850
6 200848
7 201233
8 200431
9 201123
10 201722
11 201015
12 198414
13 198912
14
Diel predation pattern assessment and exploitation of sentinel prey: new interpretations of community & individual behaviors.
200910
15 201110
16 201910
17 20188
18 19897
19 19826
20 19884

About Darius Weber

Darius Weber is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Insect Science and Statistics and Probability, having authored 23 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (1 paper), Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper) and Census and Population Estimation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (219 citations), Ecological Modeling (50 citations), Ecology (376 citations), Statistics and Probability (37 citations) and Insect Science (31 citations). Darius Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter B. Pearman, Tobias Roth, Marc Kéry, Beth Gardner, Jeffrey Andrew Royle, Valentin Amrhein, Stéphanie Claire Schai-Braun, Klaus Hackländer, Stefan Birrer and Matthias Plattner. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Wildlife Research, Biological Conservation, Journal of Zoology, Journal of Applied Ecology and Mammal Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact