Peter Nagel

2.5k citations
100 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Nagel

93 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter Nagel
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Ecological Modeling 321
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 581
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 356
  • Insect Science 310
  • Ecology 591
Replace Jayme Augusto Prevedello with:
Jayme Augusto Prevedello Brazil
Jing Chang China
David A. Nipperess Australia
Marjorie J. Wonham Canada
Roger Guevara Mexico
John B. Baumgartner Australia
Jorge Ari Noriega Colombia
Martin Zimmer Germany
Gustavo H. Kattan Colombia
Camila Duarte Ritter Brazil
Peter Nagel relative to Jayme Augusto Prevedello Brazil Jayme Augusto Prevedello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jayme Augusto Prevedello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Nagel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Nagel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Nagel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Nagel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Nagel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Nagel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Nagel. The network helps show where Peter Nagel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Nagel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Nagel Line = papers co-authored together Peter Nagel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013117
2 2011100
3 199698
4 200997
5 200695
6 201386
7 200772
8 200651
9 200349
10 201645
11 200442
12 200740
13 201039
14 201837
15 200536
16 200334
17 201429
18 201329
19 200629
20 200425

About Peter Nagel

Peter Nagel is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Insect Science, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (19 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (11 papers), Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (10 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (321 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (581 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (356 citations), Insect Science (310 citations) and Ecology (591 citations). Peter Nagel has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefanie von Fumetti, Jan Beck, Liliana Ballesteros‐Mejia, Ian J. Kitching, Daniel Haag‐Wackernagel, R. Peveling, Jacques Mersch, Simon P. Loader, Thibault Lachat and Klaus Peschke. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Biodiversity and Conservation, FEMS Microbiology Ecology and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact