Daphne Stam

437 citations
10 papers · 82 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Face Recognition and Perception 5
    • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 1
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 1
    • Memory Processes and Influences 1
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 1

Daphne Stam

10 papers receiving 80 citations

Peers

Daphne Stam
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 22
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 11
  • Social Psychology 16
Replace Jenna Traynor with:
Jenna Traynor Canada
M. Musacchio France
Robert Hermosillo United States
Karen Meersmans Belgium
Tomáš Melicher United States
Michael Kriegsman United States
Cécile Duru France
Luigi Lorenzini Netherlands
Martirio Antequera Spain
Hannah Young United States
Daphne Stam relative to Jenna Traynor Canada Jenna Traynor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jenna Traynor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daphne Stam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne Stam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne Stam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne Stam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne Stam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne Stam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne Stam. The network helps show where Daphne Stam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daphne Stam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daphne Stam Line = papers co-authored together Daphne Stam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201723
2 201921
3 20229
4 20197
5 20106
6 20224
7 20184
8 20223
9 20233
10 20212

About Daphne Stam

Daphne Stam is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 82 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (39 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (22 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (11 citations) and Social Psychology (16 citations). Daphne Stam has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jan Van den Stock, François‐Laurent De Winter, Mathieu Vandenbulcke, Koen Van Laere, Louise Emsell, Dante Mantini, Rik Vandenberghe, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, Laura Van de Vliet and Filip Bouckaert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology, Frontiers in Psychology, Communications Biology, Astrobiology and Brain and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact