Daphne Lin
Impact in
-
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Papers in
-
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 3
- Bone Metabolism and Diseases 3
- Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer 1
- TGF-β signaling in diseases 1
-
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions 4
- Co-authors
- William Y. Wang (4 shared papers)Brendon M. Baker (4 shared papers)Christopher D. Davidson (2 shared papers)Erica Brittain (1 shared paper)William J. Polacheck (2 shared papers)Crispin R. Dass (4 shared papers)Stephanie Huang (1 shared paper)Daniel L. Matera (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (3 papers)Acta Biomaterialia (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (1 paper)Pharmaceutics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
Daphne Lin
10 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cell Biology 108
- Biomaterials 55
- Immunology and Allergy 23
- Statistics and Probability 30
- Biomedical Engineering 133
Countries citing papers authored by Daphne Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne Lin. The network helps show where Daphne Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daphne Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 107 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 4 |
About Daphne Lin
Daphne Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 10 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (4 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (3 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Bone health and treatments (2 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (1 paper), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper) and TGF-β signaling in diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (108 citations), Biomaterials (55 citations), Immunology and Allergy (23 citations), Statistics and Probability (30 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (133 citations). Daphne Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include William Y. Wang, Brendon M. Baker, Christopher D. Davidson, Erica Brittain, William J. Polacheck, Crispin R. Dass, Stephanie Huang, Daniel L. Matera, Jae‐Won Shin and Ariella Shikanov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Acta Biomaterialia, Nature Communications, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology and Pharmaceutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.