Danilo Garcia

4.8k citations
144 papers · 2.4k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Danilo Garcia

139 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Danilo Garcia
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Applied Psychology 505
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 634
  • Clinical Psychology 879
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 145
Replace Fallon R. Goodman with:
Fallon R. Goodman United States
Andrew Cooper United Kingdom
Cendri A. Hutcherson Canada
Vivian Zayas United States
David J. Disabato United States
Jeremy P. Jamieson United States
Eleanor Miles United Kingdom
Stephen Kellett United Kingdom
Michelle Yik Hong Kong
Heather C. Lench United States
Danilo Garcia relative to Fallon R. Goodman United States Fallon R. Goodman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Fallon R. Goodman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danilo Garcia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danilo Garcia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danilo Garcia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danilo Garcia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danilo Garcia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danilo Garcia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danilo Garcia. The network helps show where Danilo Garcia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danilo Garcia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danilo Garcia Line = papers co-authored together Danilo Garcia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013105
2 201199
3 201888
4 201783
5 201481
6 201378
7 201670
8 200860
9 201457
10 201357
11 201255
12 200952
13 202051
14 201351
15 201150
16 201243
17 201141
18 201540
19 201340
20 201039

About Danilo Garcia

Danilo Garcia is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 144 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (39 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (24 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (18 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (17 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (16 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (15 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (14 papers) and Media Influence and Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (505 citations), Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (634 citations), Clinical Psychology (879 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (145 citations). Danilo Garcia has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Trevor Archer, Ali Al Nima, Sverker Sikström, Patricia Rosenberg, Anver Siddiqui, Saleh Moradi, Björn Persson, Oscar Kjell, Petri Kajonius and Kevin M. Cloninger. Their work appears in journals such as PeerJ, Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Happiness Studies and Heliyon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact