Danielle Leek

2.9k citations
9 papers · 142 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
    • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
    • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

Papers in

    • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus 8
    • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research 3
    • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing 8

Danielle Leek

9 papers receiving 136 citations

Peers

Danielle Leek
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Clinical Biochemistry 72
  • Infectious Diseases 95
  • Molecular Medicine 22
  • Microbiology 14
  • Endocrinology 10
Replace Lyndsey O. Hudson with:
Lyndsey O. Hudson United Kingdom
Sarah A. Egan Ireland
Erika Ungvári Hungary
Maho Yokoyama United Kingdom
Priscila de Arruda Trindade Brazil
J. C. Sinnige Netherlands
Kavindra Singh India
Luis Jáuregui-Peredo United States
Giulia Cagnoli Italy
Jasmine Coppens Belgium
Danielle Leek relative to Lyndsey O. Hudson United Kingdom Lyndsey O. Hudson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Lyndsey O. Hudson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Leek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Leek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Leek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Leek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Leek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Leek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Leek. The network helps show where Danielle Leek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Leek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Leek Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Leek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 202084
2 201913
3 201910
4 202010
5 20209
6 20198
7 20214
8 20243
9 20221

About Danielle Leek

Danielle Leek is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (8 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (8 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (72 citations), Infectious Diseases (95 citations), Molecular Medicine (22 citations), Microbiology (14 citations) and Endocrinology (10 citations). Danielle Leek has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Beth Blane, Sharon J. Peacock, Kathy E. Raven, Julian Parkhill, Nicholas M. Brown, David Enoch, Francesc Coll, Ewan M. Harrison, Gwenan M. Knight and Narender Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Microbial Genomics, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, The Lancet Microbe and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact