Danielle Ko

563 citations
22 papers · 392 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Ko

21 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Danielle Ko
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 197
  • General Health Professions 101
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 17
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
  • Clinical Psychology 49
Replace Philippa Hughes with:
Philippa Hughes United Kingdom
Adejoke O Oluyase United Kingdom
Elizabeth Rickerson United States
Sharyn Milnes Australia
Alberto Alonso‐Babarro Spain
Marian Grant United States
Maureen Metzger United States
E. Iris Groeneveld United Kingdom
Erica Perry United States
Corrine D. Truman Canada
Danielle Ko relative to Philippa Hughes United Kingdom Philippa Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Philippa Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Ko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Ko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Ko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Ko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Ko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Ko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Ko. The network helps show where Danielle Ko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Ko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Ko Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Ko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201075
2 201351
3 202039
4 201929
5 201323
6 201922
7 202021
8 201220
9 202119
10 201019
11 201214
12 202212
13 202111
14 20117
15 20216
16 20216
17 20215
18 20154
19 20234
20 20213

About Danielle Ko

Danielle Ko is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 22 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (197 citations), General Health Professions (101 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (17 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations) and Clinical Psychology (49 citations). Danielle Ko has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include David C. Currow, Amy P. Abernethy, Rosalind McDougall, Clare Delany, Lynn Gillam, Bridget Pratt, Jane L. Wheeler, Lindy Willmott, Ben White and Janet Bull. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, International Journal of Health Policy and Management and Bioethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact