Danielle Celentano

909 citations
32 papers · 618 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Celentano

32 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Danielle Celentano
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Horticulture 23
  • Forestry 71
  • Soil Science 151
  • Global and Planetary Change 307
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 169
Replace Flavio Moreno with:
Flavio Moreno Colombia
Ricardo Augusto Gorne Viani Brazil
Evert Thomas Peru
Francisco Mora Mexico
Elsa M. Ordway United States
Felipe S. M. Barros Brazil
Eshetu Yirdaw Finland
Miguel Calmon United States
Nino Tavares Amazonas Brazil
Youxin Ma China
Danielle Celentano relative to Flavio Moreno Colombia Flavio Moreno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Flavio Moreno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Celentano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Celentano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Celentano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Celentano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Celentano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Celentano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Celentano. The network helps show where Danielle Celentano may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Celentano, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Celentano Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Celentano links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201078
2 201671
3 201747
4 202047
5 201145
6 202436
7 201434
8 201728
9 201327
10 201819
11 202219
12 202018
13 201418
14 200317
15 202216
16 201515
17 201011
18 202010
19 200710
20 20219

About Danielle Celentano

Danielle Celentano is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (17 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (6 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (4 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (3 papers) and Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (23 citations), Forestry (71 citations), Soil Science (151 citations), Global and Planetary Change (307 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (169 citations). Danielle Celentano has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Guillaume Xavier Rousseau, Vera Lex Engel, Emanoel Gomes de Moura, Karen D. Holl, Rakan A. Zahawi, Rebecca J. Cole, Bryan Finegan, Rebecca Ostertag, Erin O. Sills and Márcio Sales. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, Agroforestry Systems, Pedobiologia, Revista Árvore and Biotropica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact