Danielle Braxton

578 citations
9 papers · 440 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Braxton

8 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

Danielle Braxton
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 335
  • Pharmacy 56
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Marketing 44
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace Elizabeth Mansfield with:
Elizabeth Mansfield Canada
Kamila Kiszko United States
Anna Kharmats United States
Lindsey P. Smith United States
S. McElhone United Kingdom
Beata Piórecka Poland
Susan Sinclair Canada
Agnieszka Kozioł-Kozakowska Poland
Megan Rowan United States
Shahrzad Motaghipisheh Iran
Danielle Braxton relative to Elizabeth Mansfield Canada Elizabeth Mansfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elizabeth Mansfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Braxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Braxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Braxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Braxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Braxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Braxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Braxton. The network helps show where Danielle Braxton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Braxton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Braxton Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Braxton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2011195
2 201284
3 201458
4 201648
5 201331
6 201316
7 20135
8 20223
9 20200

About Danielle Braxton

Danielle Braxton is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (335 citations), Pharmacy (56 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Marketing (44 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Danielle Braxton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Anthony J. Viera, Jonas J. Swartz, Carmen D. Samuel‐Hodge, Mellanye Lackey, Cassandra Johnson, Paul Mihas, Alice S. Ammerman, Thomas C. Keyserling, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts and Beverly A. Garcia. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Appetite, Obesity Reviews, Human Immunology and Nutrition Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact