Danielle Arzur
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Ecology top 10%
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Papers in
-
- Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies 2
- Gut microbiota and health 1
-
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 2
- Co-authors
- Georges Barbier (5 shared papers)Gaëtan Burgaud (4 shared papers)Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse (1 shared paper)Thomas Le Calvez (1 shared paper)Lucile Durand (1 shared paper)Marie‐Anne Cambon‐Bonavita (1 shared paper)Catherine Le Jossic-Corcos (5 shared papers)Laurent Corcos (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (1 paper)FEMS Microbiology Ecology (1 paper)Environmental Microbiology (1 paper)Molecular Biology Reports (1 paper)New Journal of Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FrancePortugalUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Danielle Arzur
11 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cell Biology 138
- Ecology 162
- Molecular Biology 214
- Biotechnology 22
- Food Science 45
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Arzur
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Arzur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Arzur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Arzur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Arzur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Arzur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Arzur. The network helps show where Danielle Arzur may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Arzur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 125 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 |
About Danielle Arzur
Danielle Arzur is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Ecology, Oncology and Cell Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (2 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (1 paper), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (1 paper), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (1 paper) and Gut microbiota and health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (138 citations), Ecology (162 citations), Molecular Biology (214 citations), Biotechnology (22 citations) and Food Science (45 citations). Danielle Arzur has collaborated with scholars based in France, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Georges Barbier, Gaëtan Burgaud, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse, Thomas Le Calvez, Lucile Durand, Marie‐Anne Cambon‐Bonavita, Catherine Le Jossic-Corcos, Laurent Corcos, Valérie Vasseur and Gwenola Le Dréan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Microbiology, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Environmental Microbiology, Molecular Biology Reports and New Journal of Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.