Danielle Adams

633 citations
27 papers · 436 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Adams

23 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Danielle Adams
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 234
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 15
  • Clinical Psychology 55
  • Pharmacology 42
Replace Nancy C. Brahm with:
Nancy C. Brahm United States
Marta Ielmini Italy
C. Barbui Italy
Ivano Caselli Italy
Angelika Mehnert Belgium
Ellen M. Weissman United States
Diane Snow United States
Joan M. Anzia United States
Mugdha Thakur United States
J. Reilly United Kingdom
Danielle Adams relative to Nancy C. Brahm United States Nancy C. Brahm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Nancy C. Brahm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Adams. The network helps show where Danielle Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Adams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Adams Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Adams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200998
2 200974
3 200940
4 200940
5 200935
6 201924
7 201120
8 202317
9 201013
10 200912
11 200912
12 202311
13 20168
14 20107
15 20186
16 20105
17 20243
18 20193
19 20212
20 20192

About Danielle Adams

Danielle Adams is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (234 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (15 citations), Clinical Psychology (55 citations) and Pharmacology (42 citations). Danielle Adams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Gin S. Malhi, Michael Berk, Nick O’Connor, Garry Walter, Roger Mulder, Michael Paton, Lisa Lampe, Anne Taylor, Richard Porter and Catherine Cahill. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Drugs and BMC Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact