Daniela Ulrich

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniela Ulrich
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Rheumatology 364
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 158
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Genetics 124
  • Reproductive Medicine 82
Replace Mei Yang with:
Mei Yang China
Zhe Wu Jin China
Fernando Gonçalves de Almeida Brazil
KENNETH A. KROPP United States
Laetitia M.O. de Kort Netherlands
Emanuel C. Trabuco United States
TRACY WASHINGTON CANNON United States
Patrick G. Brosnan United States
George T. Klauber United States
Ronald S. Sutherland United States
Daniela Ulrich relative to Mei Yang China Mei Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Mei Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Ulrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Ulrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Ulrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Ulrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Ulrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Ulrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Ulrich. The network helps show where Daniela Ulrich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Ulrich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Ulrich Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Ulrich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013107
2 2013104
3 201263
4 201161
5 201256
6 201445
7 201543
8 200943
9 201633
10 201433
11 201532
12 201332
13 201530
14 201528
15 201527
16 201027
17 201926
18 201521
19 201621
20 201421

About Daniela Ulrich

Daniela Ulrich is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (22 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Hernia repair and management (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (364 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (158 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Genetics (124 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (82 citations). Daniela Ulrich has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Caroline E. Gargett, Anna Rosamilia, Jerome A. Werkmeister, Rikeish R. Muralitharan, John White, V. Letouzey, Ker Sin Tan, Sharon L. Edwards, Karl F Tamussino and John A. M. Ramshaw. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurourology and Urodynamics, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, International Urogynecology Journal and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact