Daniela Strohm

9 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Daniela Strohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 320
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 94
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 128
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 72
  • Physiology 101
Replace Jéssica Batista Beserra with:
Jéssica Batista Beserra Brazil
Judith Spungen United States
Ebrahim Falahi Iran
Jennifer P. Hellwig United States
Gilberto Simeone Henriques Brazil
L. Mallory Boylan United States
Rajendra Agrawal India
Carla Soraya Costa Maia Brazil
its Panel on Folate
Other B Vitamins
Daniela Strohm relative to Jéssica Batista Beserra Brazil Jéssica Batista Beserra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Jéssica Batista Beserra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Strohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Strohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Strohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Strohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Strohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Strohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Strohm. The network helps show where Daniela Strohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Strohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Strohm Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Strohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015259
2 2012151
3 201442
4 201730
5
Position of the German Nutrition Society (DGE).
201624
6 201719
7 201617
8 20126
9
Glykämischer Index und glykämische Last - ein für die Ernährungspraxis des Gesunden relevantes Konzept? Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der DGE
20134

About Daniela Strohm

Daniela Strohm is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Digestive system and related health (2 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers), Sodium Intake and Health (2 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (1 paper) and Trace Elements in Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (320 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (94 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (128 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (72 citations) and Physiology (101 citations). Daniela Strohm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Eva Leschik‐Bonnet, Angela Bechthold, H. Heseker, R. Brigelius‐Flohé, Anna P. Kipp, Lutz Schomburg, Heiner Boeing, Jakob Linseisen, Matthias B. Schulze and Anette E. Buyken. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact