Daniela Strohm

9 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Daniela Strohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 328
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 88
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 64
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
  • Physiology 93
Replace Jéssica Batista Beserra with:
Jéssica Batista Beserra Brazil
Judith Spungen United States
Janneke Verkaik-Kloosterman Netherlands
Other B Vitamins
its Panel on Folate
Institute of Medicine
Xiubo Jiang China
Ebrahim Falahi Iran
Amélie Casgrain United Kingdom
Jennifer P. Hellwig United States
Daniela Strohm relative to Jéssica Batista Beserra Brazil Jéssica Batista Beserra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jéssica Batista Beserra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Strohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Strohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Strohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Strohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Strohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Strohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Strohm. The network helps show where Daniela Strohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Strohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Strohm Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Strohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015280
2 2012167
3 201444
4 201731
5
Position of the German Nutrition Society (DGE).
201624
6 201721
7 201618
8 20127
9
Glykämischer Index und glykämische Last - ein für die Ernährungspraxis des Gesunden relevantes Konzept? Wissenschaftliche Stellungnahme der DGE
20134

About Daniela Strohm

Daniela Strohm is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Rheumatology, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Sodium Intake and Health (2 papers), Digestive system and related health (2 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (1 paper), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (328 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (88 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (64 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (109 citations) and Physiology (93 citations). Daniela Strohm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Eva Leschik‐Bonnet, Angela Bechthold, H. Heseker, Lutz Schomburg, Anna P. Kipp, R. Brigelius‐Flohé, Anette E. Buyken, Matthias B. Schulze, Hans Hauner and Heiner Boeing. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, NFS Journal, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition and DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact