Daniela Spettoli

632 citations
9 papers · 427 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Spettoli

9 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Daniela Spettoli
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Reproductive Medicine 299
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 210
  • Parasitology 50
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 54
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 12
Replace Gregory S. Neal with:
Gregory S. Neal United States
Achhelal Pasi India
Maria Elisa Smith United States
Fatou Jaiteh Gambia
Carole Splingart France
Claire Young United States
L. Mandia Italy
Patrícia Marques Portugal
F. S. Stewart Ireland
Amy Hummel United States
Daniela Spettoli relative to Gregory S. Neal United States Gregory S. Neal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gregory S. Neal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Spettoli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Spettoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Spettoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Spettoli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Spettoli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Spettoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Spettoli. The network helps show where Daniela Spettoli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Spettoli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Spettoli Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Spettoli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2002110
2 199997
3 200179
4 201550
5 199940
6 201924
7 201317
8 19969
9 19961

About Daniela Spettoli

Daniela Spettoli is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (1 paper), Gynecological conditions and treatments (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (1 paper) and Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (299 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (210 citations), Parasitology (50 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (54 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (12 citations). Daniela Spettoli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Ciampaglia, Graçiela Estela Cognigni, Marco Filicori, Stefania Taraborrelli, Patrizia Pocognoli, Simona Di Mario, Roberto D’Amico, Carlo Gagliotti, Vittorio Basevi and Nicola Magrini. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and Archives of Women s Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact