Daniela Schoberer

28 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers

Daniela Schoberer
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 135
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 97
  • Physiology 291
  • Rehabilitation 48
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 106
Replace Rafael Mesquita with:
Rafael Mesquita Brazil
Caitlin McArthur Canada
José Alberto Laredo‐Aguilera Spain
Karolina Piotrowicz Poland
Nini H. Jonkman Netherlands
Jack Roberto Silva Fhon Brazil
Aquiles Assunção Camelier Brazil
Álvaro Campos Cavalcanti Maciel Brazil
Fisun Şenuzun Aykar Türkiye
Yuxia Ma China
Daniela Schoberer relative to Rafael Mesquita Brazil Rafael Mesquita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rafael Mesquita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Schoberer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Schoberer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Schoberer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Schoberer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Schoberer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Schoberer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Schoberer. The network helps show where Daniela Schoberer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Schoberer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Schoberer Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Schoberer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012345
2 202247
3 201633
4 202031
5 202230
6 202125
7 202324
8 202020
9 202219
10 201917
11 202215
12 20189
13 20189
14 20188
15 20147
16 20246
17 20166
18 20236
19 20225
20 20233

About Daniela Schoberer

Daniela Schoberer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Physiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (135 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (97 citations), Physiology (291 citations), Rehabilitation (48 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (106 citations). Daniela Schoberer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ruud J.G. Halfens, Luc J. C. van Loon, Judith Meijers, Donja M. Mijnarends, Alfonso J. Cruz‐Jentoft, Jos M. G. A. Schols, Sjors Verlaan, Sovianne ter Borg, Yvette C. Luiking and Christa Lohrmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, International Journal of Older People Nursing, Alzheimer s & Dementia and European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact