Daniela Leal
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Social Psychology top 5%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Papers in
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 10
-
- Family Support in Illness 4
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 4
- Co-authors
- Jorge Gato (15 shared papers)Fiona Tasker (10 shared papers)Susana Coimbrã (5 shared papers)D. Seabra (3 shared papers)Matilda Wurm (3 shared papers)Elder Cerqueira-Santos (2 shared papers)Geva Shenkman (2 shared papers)Jaime Barrientos (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Sexuality Research and Social Policy (3 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (3 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (2 papers)British Journal of Clinical Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Family Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniela Leal
17 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Reproductive Medicine 121
- Social Psychology 228
- Gender Studies 65
- Demography 64
- Clinical Psychology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Leal
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Leal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Leal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Leal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Leal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Leal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Leal. The network helps show where Daniela Leal may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Leal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 1 |
About Daniela Leal
Daniela Leal is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Reproductive Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Demography, having authored 17 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (10 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (121 citations), Social Psychology (228 citations), Gender Studies (65 citations), Demography (64 citations) and Clinical Psychology (88 citations). Daniela Leal has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Gato, Fiona Tasker, Susana Coimbrã, D. Seabra, Matilda Wurm, Elder Cerqueira-Santos, Geva Shenkman, Jaime Barrientos, Marina Miscioscia and Anna Malmquist. Their work appears in journals such as Sexuality Research and Social Policy, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology, British Journal of Clinical Psychology and Journal of Family Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.