Daniela Katz

1.0k citations
30 papers · 647 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Katz

29 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Daniela Katz
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 319
  • Oncology 264
  • Gastroenterology 46
  • Neurology 94
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 119
Replace Hongyu Wu with:
Hongyu Wu United States
Thomas Zaramboukas Greece
Myrella Vlenterie Netherlands
Kou Kaneko Japan
Taflan Salepçi Türkiye
Akiko Tonooka Japan
Junichi Shiraishi Japan
Rashpal Flora United Kingdom
Yufan Cheng China
Brinda Rao Korivi United States
Daniela Katz relative to Hongyu Wu United States Hongyu Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Hongyu Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Katz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Katz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Katz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Katz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Katz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Katz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Katz. The network helps show where Daniela Katz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Katz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Katz Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Katz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016142
2 200990
3 200663
4 201857
5 201252
6 200435
7 201732
8 200831
9 201329
10 201221
11 201217
12 201611
13 201811
14 20048
15 20157
16 20186
17 20045
18 20125
19 20234
20 20204

About Daniela Katz

Daniela Katz is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (8 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (2 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (319 citations), Oncology (264 citations), Gastroenterology (46 citations), Neurology (94 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (119 citations). Daniela Katz has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alexander J. Lazar, Dina Lev, Seth M. Pollack, Emanuela Palmerini, Reuven Or, Dina Ben‐Yehuda, Dror Meirow, Tamar Peretz, Jaron Rabinovici and Giovanni Grignani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, BMC Cancer, Acta Oncologica, Medicine and Carcinogenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact