Daniela Degortes

23 papers receiving 778 citations

Peers

Daniela Degortes
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 611
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 105
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 118
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
Replace Anna N. Voßbeck-Elsebusch with:
Anna N. Voßbeck-Elsebusch Germany
Jean Chambry France
Raffaella La Rovere Italy
Freya Corfield United Kingdom
Laura Perini Italy
Jodie Richardson Canada
Gilbert Pinard Canada
Anna M. Ehret Germany
Paolo Meneguzzo Italy
Eberhard Schulz Germany
Daniela Degortes relative to Anna N. Voßbeck-Elsebusch Germany Anna N. Voßbeck-Elsebusch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Anna N. Voßbeck-Elsebusch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Degortes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Degortes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Degortes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Degortes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Degortes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Degortes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Degortes. The network helps show where Daniela Degortes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Degortes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Degortes Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Degortes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010185
2 201894
3 200455
4 201342
5 200941
6 201541
7 201539
8 200038
9 201237
10 201535
11 201827
12 201821
13 201421
14 201419
15 201519
16 201519
17 200717
18 201413
19 201013
20 201412

About Daniela Degortes

Daniela Degortes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Education, having authored 23 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (17 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (611 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (118 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations). Daniela Degortes has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Angela Favaro, Elena Tenconi, Paolo Santonastaso, Romina Bosello, Enrico Collantoni, Renzo Manara, Daniela Mapelli, Tatiana Zanetti, Marco Solmi and Paolo Meneguzzo. Their work appears in journals such as European Eating Disorders Review, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, Psychological Medicine and The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact