Daniela Csencsics
Impact in
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology
- Plant and animal studies
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
Papers in
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology 4
- Plant and animal studies 3
- Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy 2
- Genetics 7
- Genetic diversity and population structure 6
- Co-authors
- Rolf Holderegger (11 shared papers)Sabine Brodbeck (4 shared papers)Christoph Scheidegger (3 shared papers)Silke Werth (3 shared papers)Félix Gugerli (5 shared papers)Helene H. Wagner (2 shared papers)Jesse M. Kalwij (1 shared paper)Sonia Angelone (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Heredity (2 papers)Journal for Nature Conservation (2 papers)Biodiversity and Conservation (1 paper)Annals of Botany (1 paper)Journal of Evolutionary Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyEstonia
In The Last Decade
Daniela Csencsics
17 papers receiving 612 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 373
- Ecological Modeling 48
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 113
- Plant Science 300
- Insect Science 90
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Csencsics
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Csencsics's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Csencsics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Csencsics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Csencsics
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Csencsics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Csencsics. The network helps show where Daniela Csencsics may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Csencsics, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 103 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 2 |
About Daniela Csencsics
Daniela Csencsics is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecological Modeling, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (3 papers) and Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (373 citations), Ecological Modeling (48 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (113 citations), Plant Science (300 citations) and Insect Science (90 citations). Daniela Csencsics has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Holderegger, Sabine Brodbeck, Christoph Scheidegger, Silke Werth, Félix Gugerli, Helene H. Wagner, Jesse M. Kalwij, Sonia Angelone, Susan E. Hoebee and Carole Adolf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Heredity, Journal for Nature Conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation, Annals of Botany and Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.