Daniel William Wright

827 citations
23 papers · 693 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel William Wright

22 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Daniel William Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Parasitology 163
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 283
  • Aquatic Science 149
  • Ecology 495
  • Immunology 273
Replace D. Jackson with:
D. Jackson Ireland
Ove Tommy Skilbrei Norway
Reginald B. Blaylock United States
P. A. Bjørn Norway
CJ Hayward Australia
Ane V. Nytrø Norway
Tone Vågseth Norway
Cristina Cruz Portugal
Duane E. Barker Canada
Kirsten Rough Australia
Daniel William Wright relative to D. Jackson Ireland D. Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
D. Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel William Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel William Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel William Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel William Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel William Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel William Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel William Wright. The network helps show where Daniel William Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel William Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel William Wright Line = papers co-authored together Daniel William Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201692
2 201875
3 201775
4 201763
5 201752
6 201950
7 202043
8 201642
9 201428
10 201826
11 201925
12 201919
13 201915
14 201215
15 202013
16 201913
17 202013
18 201811
19 20218
20 20126

About Daniel William Wright

Daniel William Wright is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Parasitology, Immunology and Aquatic Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (13 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (8 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (4 papers), Marine and fisheries research (3 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (3 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (2 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (163 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (283 citations), Aquatic Science (149 citations), Ecology (495 citations) and Immunology (273 citations). Daniel William Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Norway and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frode Oppedal, Lars Helge Stien, Tim Dempster, Samantha Bui, Jan Erik Fosseidengen, Egil Karlsbakk, Tore Seternes, Tone Vågseth, Malthe Hvas and Francisca Samsing. Their work appears in journals such as Aquaculture, Aquacultural Engineering, Conservation Physiology, Journal of Fish Diseases and Hydrobiologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact