Daniel Wagner

5.4k citations
151 papers · 3.8k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Wagner

146 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Daniel Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 887
  • Animal Science and Zoology 550
  • Surgery 1.4k
  • Equine 34
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 345
Replace Rainer Schubert with:
Rainer Schubert Germany
Arthur W. Mahoney United States
Xuefeng Han China
Xinyun Li China
Guangpeng Li China
Kouichi Watanabe Japan
Brijesh Patel India
Michael C. Rudolph United States
Yanli Liu China
Chang Woo Lee South Korea
Daniel Wagner relative to Rainer Schubert Germany Rainer Schubert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Rainer Schubert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wagner. The network helps show where Daniel Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Wagner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Wagner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000387
2 1993217
3 2015116
4 2017104
5 201498
6 201094
7 201389
8 201287
9 200984
10 200982
11 197979
12 200975
13 201971
14 198171
15 201670
16 201470
17 197968
18 201768
19 201967
20 198866

About Daniel Wagner

Daniel Wagner is a scholar working on Surgery, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 151 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (44 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (26 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (14 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (13 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (11 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers) and Food composition and properties (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (887 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (550 citations), Surgery (1.4k citations), Equine (34 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (345 citations). Daniel Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Pol Maria Rommens, Alexander Hofmann, F. N. Owens, Dieter Schmalstieg, S. K. Duckett, Charlotte Arand, C. A. Hibberd, H. G. Dolezal, Toru Kubota and Yun You Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Journal of Dairy Science, Scientific Reports and Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact