Daniel W. Kim

23 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Daniel W. Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Otorhinolaryngology 19
  • Epidemiology 143
  • Neurology 45
  • Genetics 26
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 21
Replace Helen Benghiat with:
Helen Benghiat United Kingdom
Atsuto Katano Japan
Francesca Soldà United Kingdom
Shaoqin He China
Yunbao Xia China
Mark J. Stavas United States
Bao Jing China
Sabine Kröger Germany
P. Haering Germany
Verena Hartung-Knemeyer Germany
Daniel W. Kim relative to Helen Benghiat United Kingdom Helen Benghiat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Helen Benghiat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Kim. The network helps show where Daniel W. Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Kim Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015103
2 202033
3 202031
4 201920
5 202117
6 202117
7 202116
8 202015
9 201914
10 202110
11 201210
12 20209
13 20216
14 20196
15 20195
16 20215
17 20214
18 20193
19 20222
20 20202

About Daniel W. Kim

Daniel W. Kim is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper) and Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (19 citations), Epidemiology (143 citations), Neurology (45 citations), Genetics (26 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (21 citations). Daniel W. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include William L. Hwang, Jay S. Loeffler, Andrzej Niemierko, Helen A. Shih, Robert L. Martuza, Fred G. Barker, William T. Curry, Kevin Oh, Anat Stemmer‐Rachamimov and Ariel E. Marciscano. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Advances in Radiation Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neuro-Oncology and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact