Daniel Viehoff

583 citations
10 papers · 165 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Viehoff

8 papers receiving 155 citations

Peers

Daniel Viehoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Political Science and International Relations 137
  • Philosophy 64
  • Law 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 22
Replace Saladin Meckled‐García with:
Saladin Meckled‐García United Kingdom
Robert Jubb United Kingdom
Bas van der Vossen United States
Andrew Lister Canada
Glen Newey United Kingdom
G.C.G.J. van Roermund Netherlands
Páll S. Árdal Canada
Claus Kreß Germany
Sean Ingham United States
Grant Lamond United Kingdom
Daniel Viehoff relative to Saladin Meckled‐García United Kingdom Saladin Meckled‐García's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Saladin Meckled‐García · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Viehoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Viehoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Viehoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Viehoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Viehoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Viehoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Viehoff. The network helps show where Daniel Viehoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Viehoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Viehoff Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Viehoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2014111
2 201615
3 201012
4 201611
5 20179
6 20134
7 20241
8 20191
9
Prisoner voting for the final general election before release is a solution that balances concerns about democratic rights
20131
10 20160

About Daniel Viehoff

Daniel Viehoff is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Strategy and Management and Law, having authored 10 papers that have together received 165 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), European and International Law Studies (1 paper) and Ombudsman and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (137 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), Law (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (64 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (22 citations). Daniel Viehoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hélène Landemore, Jack Knight, Nadia Urbinati and Jonathan Parry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Philosophy, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Critical Review and Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact