Daniel Viehoff
Impact in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- War, Ethics, and Justification
Papers in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 11
- International Law and Human Rights 2
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 2
- Political Theory and Influence 2
-
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Co-authors
- Hélène Landemore (1 shared paper)Nadia Urbinati (1 shared paper)Jack Knight (1 shared paper)Jonathan Parry (1 shared paper)Johann Frick (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy & Public Affairs (2 papers)Journal of Political Philosophy (2 papers)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1 paper)Mind (1 paper)Critical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Viehoff
10 papers receiving 209 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Political Science and International Relations 206
- Philosophy 89
- Law 34
- Cognitive Neuroscience 36
- Sociology and Political Science 85
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Viehoff
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Viehoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Viehoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Viehoff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Viehoff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Viehoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Viehoff. The network helps show where Daniel Viehoff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Viehoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 140 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 16 | Prisoner voting for the final general election before release is a solution that balances concerns about democratic rights | 2013 | 0 |
About Daniel Viehoff
Daniel Viehoff is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Law and Strategy and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (11 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (206 citations), Philosophy (89 citations), Law (34 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (36 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (85 citations). Daniel Viehoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hélène Landemore, Nadia Urbinati, Jack Knight, Jonathan Parry and Johann Frick. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Public Affairs, Journal of Political Philosophy, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Mind and Critical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.